CALL: 800-596-6176
HOME CONTACT US SITE MAP

Recent

Posts
Subscribe to this blog
RSS Feed

Untitled Page
Entries tagged with "information security"
Paper Records and Information Security

Christopher_Barnett JP Morgan Chase recently received an unwanted reminder that information security demands attention to more than just the data residing on network hard drives and digital media. “Protestors” from the Service Employees International Union (“SEIU”) filmed themselves sifting through trash in dumpsters outside several New York City Chase Bank branch locations and apparently finding numerous, un-shredded customer financial statements in trash bags awaiting pickup. (The SEIU has been in a dispute with Chase regarding the bank’s use of non-union security employees.) The video quickly achieved notoriety after being posted on YouTube.com here.

While the video might have been more clearly damning if it had included footage of Chase employees actually dumping the bags, regardless of its weight, it serves as a valuable reminder to all businesses maintaining sensitive customer records that information security does not begin and end with electronic data. Clearly, no IS policy is complete unless it includes provisions for the proper collection, handling, storage and disposal of paper records containing private information. Chase has stated that it has reached out to the SEIU for information regarding the records appearing in the video and that it is investigating whether and/or the extent to which its employees may have violated its internal IS policies.

The consequences for failing to adequately protect against loss or theft of personal customer data are becoming increasingly severe. Expenses associated with information security breaches can and often do include the costs to notify and assist affected persons, loss of customers, litigation and consulting costs, regulatory fines, and diminution of stockholder share value. In Chase’s case, if the video footage does in fact end up being evidence of a failure on the company’s part to effectively enforce the paper record disposal policies it says it has, then it is not difficult to imagine that the number of affected customers – and Chase’s potential loss exposure – could be quite high indeed.

For more information regarding the consequences of data breaches, you can obtain a copy of a recent national survey on that subject commissioned by Scott & Scott, LLP and independently conducted by the Ponemon Institute by clicking here.

 

Tags:

information security
Posted on: 12:00:00 AM | Permalink |
Student Loan Company Settles With FTC

Ilan_JenkinsThe FTC announced on March 4 a settlement with Goal Financial, LLC, a San Diego-based student loan company that allegedly violated information privacy laws. If accepted, the settlement will require Goal Financial to implement a comprehensive information security program and subject itself to independent, third-party audits every two years for 10 years.

Goal Financial provides a variety of loan services and collects personal information from loan applications and other sources. The information includes name, address, telephone number, driver’s license number, Social Security number, date of birth, and income, debt, and employment information in its course of business. The company is therefore a “financial institution” according to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) and is subject to the GLBA’s Safeguards Rule and Privacy Rule. Goal Financial stores the records in electronic and paper form.

The FTC’s complaint alleges that Goal Financial engaged in a number of practices that, taken together, failed to employ reasonable and appropriate security measures
to protect personal information. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Goal Financial placed at risk the personal information of over 41,000 consumers because it failed to:

(1) assess adequately risks to the information it collected and stored in its paper files and on its computer network;
(2) restrict adequately access to personal information stored in its paper files and on its computer network to authorized employees;
(3) implement a comprehensive information security program, including reasonable policies and procedures in key areas such as the collection, handling, and disposal of personal information;
(4) provide adequate training to employees about handling and protecting personal information and responding to security incidents; and
(5) require third-party service providers by contract to protect the security and confidentiality of personal information.

Goal Financial’s employees allegedly exploited these failures and removed more than 7000 consumer files containing sensitive information without authorization and transferred them to third parties. In 2006, a Goal Financial employee sold to the public computer hard drives containing personal information of approximately 34,000 consumers.

Due to such failures, Goal Financial also violated the Safeguards Rule of the GLBA which requires financial institutions to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of customer information be developing a comprehensive written information security program that contains reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.

Additionally, The Privacy Rule requires financial institutions to provide customers, no later than when a customer relationship arises and annually for the duration of that relationship, “a clear and conspicuous notice that accurately reflects [the financial institution’s] privacy policies and practices” including its security policies and practices. Goal Financial distributed to its customers a privacy policy that contained false or misleading statements regarding the measures implemented to protect its customers’ personal information.

The proposed settlement requires Goal Financial to institute measures to bring it into compliance with the rules stated above and to prevent it from committing future violations.

View the news release http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/03/studlend.shtm

View the complaint http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723013/080304complaint.pdf

View the proposed settlement http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723013/080304analysis.pdf

 

Tags:

information security
Posted on: 12:00:00 AM | Permalink |
Drafting and Defending Privacy Policies and Incident Response Plans

Julie_Machal_FulksBecause the requirements for businesses that collect personal information about consumers can be stringent, it is critical to know which standards apply. Regardless of which regulations govern an organization, it is imperative that the organization have a comprehensive privacy policy that satisfies the requirements for the applicable industry and geographic location(s).

Every privacy policy should contain a clear and concise statement of what personal information the organization collects, whether the company discloses the information to third-parties, and if so, under what circumstances, a list of the safeguards employed to protect the information, and a discussion of any opt-out provisions required.

Your company can face potential liability if your privacy policy does not reflect your actual privacy practices. Claims and remedies based on privacy policies can include:

  • Investigations by appropriate regulatory authorities.
  • Orders prohibiting further misrepresentations.
  • Orders requiring an independent, periodic analysis certifying that the company has a comprehensive information security program.
  • Claims based on negligence for failing to follow enumerated policies.
  • Civil fines.
  • Officer and director liability.

It is vital that companies use customized privacy policies prepared after carefully considering their ability to deliver on their promises. For that reason, it is not advisable to copy policies from the internet, or promise more than is legally required.

Tags:

data privacy information security
Posted on: 12/1/2009 4:43:04 AM | Permalink |
Dave & Buster’s Busted

KeliThe FTC recently approved a settlement with Dave & Buster’s, Inc., a restaurant and arcade chain, for the largest recorded data breach of private credit card information.

The hackers responsible for stealing credit card data from Dave & Buster’s gained access through an unsecured wireless Internet router, or wireless access point (WAP).  The hackers had sought out businesses with no Internet security password and, after gaining access to the networks, had obtained credit card numbers and customer data in real time as the cards were swiped.

There is a growing trend for the FTC to seek civil damages for lax Internet security in order to encourage businesses to provide additional protective measures for online data, including wireless Internet routers.  In addition to the monetary damages Dave & Buster’s will pay to settle the claim related to this data breach, the company will be required to maintain an information security program and to have its security systems professionally audited semi-annually.

Basic information security guidelines can help to prevent this type of breach.  It is important to secure passwords, to enable firewall protection, and to institute additional, appropriate security safeguards to protect consumer information.  This is especially important when dealing with sensitive financial data.

Tags:

data breach information security
Posted on: 8/7/2010 12:32:05 PM | Permalink |

Other

Blogs


footer homepage contact us terms of use privacy sitemap attorney advertising